Nam Viet Nation ...
Some points about Nam Viet Nation in the Chinese Conventional Book of History
The current Chinese official book of history is a blend of 'true' and 'villain' story. Despite inadequate proves it is simple to recognize: where there are notes that disdain the Bach Viet and especially Lac Viet, a culture which was proved to have ten thousand years of development—it is sure this is 'villain' note. To understand the credit of conventional Chinese history, so is its identity; it is easy to find the parts of villain in the conventional book of history.
The chapter “Country of Nam Viet” of King Trieu Đa is the most distorted chapter, in Han history’s book.
Just surfing through few lines we can notice immediately terrible fabrication of the fake historians who write for the Han authority’s orders--- Despite the dislike, the honest historian never have tones like that.
Just surfing through few lines we can notice immediately terrible fabrication of the fake historians who write for the Han authority’s orders--- Despite the dislike, the honest historian never have tones like that.
History book of Tư Mã Thiên ( Already being erased and corrected?), volume 113, part: “Nam Việt Liệt Truyện và Hán Thư của Ban Cố” in story and Chinese book of, volume. 6, writes: "Year Tần Thủy Hoàng’s 33 th –to 214: only by using bad peoples: people handling deserted, orphan, people stay with the wife's family (weak men), wholesale people for who make grabby, Han can strike to seize The Six Township (Luc Luong) to establish Que Lâm South China Sea (Nam Hải, Tượng Quận."
To Attack and seize people's country without the need to use army, but only need to use impair, invalid, undisciplined people… And later to order this bad population remaining there to cohabit and in time to homogenize Viet people? This concept, connotation goes further to aim at hidden intention: to disdain forever the Viet’s descendents: by implying that: you are the kind of people descendents of ancestors who are combination of barbarian and hoodlum. Therefore of course your lineage is kind of degraded, brain damage. (Please distinguish between there are huge difference between the revolutionist and protagonist in England last two centuries who quit Europe moving to America and Australia. and the hoodlums of a undeveloped and poor society of Asia, thousands years ago.. big difference between these two prisoner groups.. one is a kind of people in a western civilized society. And one is people in more than a thousand years ago, in a feudal society…
The historian rooted horse raising continue to write: The King Trieu Da—king of the Viet, bow low to Han’s King, said: “your majesty emperor, since Cao Hau lead the country, living close to, and therefore trust and influenced by the barbarians. She become small minded to the extend to believe in lower authorities, who reported that Your country discriminate against barbarous tribe, orders not to sell for the outsider-- barbarous Viet people the technology to till the land, to tense the goat and the horse, the buffalo. Only sell the male breeding animals. So the goat becomes too old.. and therefore we people in remote Viet areas cannot use their bad meat for praying occasions.. It is the mistake that we committed, and I know I ought to receive dead punishment for that…”
This perception about the Viet society: a country is remained in prehistory’s level of development, when the Han Chinese society is already civilized are taught up to nowadays to cheat a whole world about this, is a criminal action of Han race. It says that Viet live in a hunting without breeding capacity. It has to import stocks of cattle, and unfamiliar with cultivation at year 1000 ad. It uses only import stocks, tools, without ability to produce even primitive tools for agriculture. The truth is, on the road from barbarian to civilized society, the Viet does not experience “half idiot half people’s stage as such.
The Han historians invented such poor story, only the hog bran' brains is able to distort the truth so intentionally and bizarrely, it continue to write:
Nam hải was so terrible, more still awfully People who live in its surrounding area : " The mandi (barbarous) people lives in the middle part of a low ground wet humid land. In the East of Viet Mân land only about thousand persons, also profess " vương " (king)
In the West, is Âu Lạc, name of Viet country, is a country very primitive, nakedness poor people which profess to be " vương " king, either. Tan Thuy Hoang, the King of Viet said: “I take courage to make an official title for my self, only for enjoy, dare not to bring this name to the ear of your majesty.”
The population of Mân Viet is about one thousand people—Man Viet is the land of the East of Viet--Hoa’s country – ". Like that orthodox Chinese historians mean: Mân Viet (one of our Bach Viet also only on the tribal stage at the most. )
Through only few pages in the Books of Chinese orthodox history, it is easy to see intentional bias and more over, the enemy discrimination they made to Viet’s nation: a country with archeological proves of very old culture. In many areas: Ceramic, Bronze, Ironwork, cattle and agriculture, transportation means: ship, vehicle, silk, paper technology, compass, etc… All have been produced in Viet’s –Southeast Asia for about 6-10 thousands years ago—These archeological data were found only through few excavation works. The contradiction between Chinese conventional book of history and Viet Hoa (Bach Viet) archeological documents are very clear. And not only archeological works, but in other areas of study: myth, story telling, legendary, proverbs, poem, literature and especially in I ching’s fengshui art of building, ways of life, ..etc..So many proves….,) all and all are proved to be totally contradict with what are being written and said in Chinese Han’s history in short, saying ”a Viet in a barbarous condition… only in more than 1000 years ago.”
The proves even in very primal stage of research already are the hardest flaps to their faces; even with any one who read that history and believe with bad intention to protect that streams as truth or trustworthy notions, also deserve such slap receiving.